1More Podcast — January 2010
Kenneth R. Morefield, Elizabeth Rambo, and Peter Waldron podcast about their favorite films of 2009.
Kenneth R. Morefield, Elizabeth Rambo, and Peter Waldron podcast about their favorite films of 2009.
These films reflect my favorite experiences of the year in cinema. I also think they are very good.
One strength of the film is that it relies heavily on the words of a wordsmith.
The act of reviewing carries with it a strain of judgment, and when reviewing a documentary it is hard not to feel as though one is judging the subject and not just the artists' presentation of him or her. Which of us would dare judge Eva Moses Kor?
What is your favorite Stephen Frears film? And why do you think he doesn't get the love and acclaim of some of his contemporaries?
A lot of films can break your heart--a precious few can enlarge and renovate it.
In a nutshell, a must see for cinophiles. Others might consider taking a pass.
I will admit that the film has the sort of schmaltzy feel (aided by the over the top score) of its era. It was released in 1937, so some of the acting is what we'd describe as overwrought today.
Victor Hugo's novel is a timeless classic which has been retold and well loved since its inception, in part because it tells the story of ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances. The contemporary stage adaptation focuses on the antagonistic relationship between Valjean and Javert, but Bernard's film really focuses more on Valjean's spiritual development, echoing the novel's emphasis on his experience of grace and the way that it changes him gradually. Valjean is one of the great characters in the history of literature, and Harry Baur is totally up to the task of bringing him to life. The film feels less like an adaptation than a translation, and every time I assumed there would be a concession to staging or special effects--the barricades, the sewers--Bernard is able to take us there without drawing attention to the effects for effects sake.