Bernard's film looks and feels contemporary, even 70 years after its making.

Every now and then when teaching film, you get to introduce a budding cinephile to Citizen Kane for the first time. It is not uncommon in my experience for their initial response to it to be one of slight confusion. The techniques don’t seem particularly new and innovative to them. That, I suggest, is exactly the point. They are comparing the film to all the films they’ve seen since Welles’s masterpiece, not to films that were made at or around the same time.

You could have told me that Raymond Bernard’s three part adaptation of Victor Hugo’s novel was filmed in 1994 and I would have believed it. It was, however, filmed in 1934.

I wrote some notes about my initial response to the film at Cinevox, so I’ll just link to them here. My write up also contains a link to Doug Cummings’s excellent review at Filmjourney.

Victor Hugo’s novel is a timeless classic which has been retold and well loved since its inception, in part because it tells the story of ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances. The contemporary stage adaptation focuses on the antagonistic relationship between Valjean and Javert, but Bernard’s film really focuses more on Valjean’s spiritual development, echoing the novel’s emphasis on his experience of grace and the way that it changes him gradually. Valjean is one of the great characters in the history of literature, and Harry Baur is totally up to the task of bringing him to life. The film feels less like an adaptation than a translation, and every time I assumed there would be a concession to staging or special effects–the barricades, the sewers–Bernard is able to take us there without drawing attention to the effects for effects sake.

Les Miserables is story the celebrates goodness. It is a joy to watch.