<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Single Man (Ford, 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1morefilmblog.com/wordpress/a-single-man-ford-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1morefilmblog.com/wordpress/a-single-man-ford-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:15:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Morefield</title>
		<link>http://1morefilmblog.com/wordpress/a-single-man-ford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13817</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Morefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1morefilmblog.com/wordpress/?p=1815#comment-13817</guid>
		<description>Hi Ken,

I figured you had posted on the film because I think I vaguely remember discussing it in a tangential way. At least I think you&#039;re why it hit my &quot;films I want to see&quot; radar screen.

What got me most about Firth&#039;s performance was his economical, yet totally believeable, portrayal of bereavement swallowed. The film&#039;s historical setting did not allow for men in general to grieve outwardly, let alone gay men over gay lovers. Yet I also got the sense that it was less about his constriction being completely about his sexuality in a repressed, yet supposedly open era...and was more about the contained nature of the self. Certainly that&#039;s in the writer&#039;s parenthetical.

I find your point on withholding in the teacher/student relationship quite interesting...perhaps it was at play too in Julianne Moore&#039;s character as well. One gets the sense that this is the first time she&#039;s broached the &quot;if only you were straight&quot; topic with any kind of sincerity.

I agree that the film was strongest when it was exploring the nature of grief rather than the historical constraints.

Certainly a film worth seeing. Not one I need to own though. Guess that&#039;s how I&#039;m judging films these days of streaming and download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ken,</p>
<p>I figured you had posted on the film because I think I vaguely remember discussing it in a tangential way. At least I think you&#8217;re why it hit my &#8220;films I want to see&#8221; radar screen.</p>
<p>What got me most about Firth&#8217;s performance was his economical, yet totally believeable, portrayal of bereavement swallowed. The film&#8217;s historical setting did not allow for men in general to grieve outwardly, let alone gay men over gay lovers. Yet I also got the sense that it was less about his constriction being completely about his sexuality in a repressed, yet supposedly open era&#8230;and was more about the contained nature of the self. Certainly that&#8217;s in the writer&#8217;s parenthetical.</p>
<p>I find your point on withholding in the teacher/student relationship quite interesting&#8230;perhaps it was at play too in Julianne Moore&#8217;s character as well. One gets the sense that this is the first time she&#8217;s broached the &#8220;if only you were straight&#8221; topic with any kind of sincerity.</p>
<p>I agree that the film was strongest when it was exploring the nature of grief rather than the historical constraints.</p>
<p>Certainly a film worth seeing. Not one I need to own though. Guess that&#8217;s how I&#8217;m judging films these days of streaming and download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

